<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Kahn Artist Filmworks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kafilmworks.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kafilmworks.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 07:03:55 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Confusion is nothing new by dtzfilms</title>
		<link>http://www.kafilmworks.com/confusion-is-nothing-new/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>dtzfilms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 07:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paintthetruth.net/allwebsites/kafilmworks/?p=131#comment-53</guid>
		<description>The notion that a man requires a woman for completion and validation and not vice versa is quite risible. Were it so, creation would cease, women would wilt. Whether you see it or not, whether a woman chooses to acknowledge it or not, in public or private they are insecure beings who seek constant affirmation of their sex appeal and beauty from men, their staple diet being attention from desirable males, even when they&#039;re married. Married women still like to think they can attract the roving eye only to dangle that sorry-I&#039;m married-ring and delight in a poor bugger&#039;s look of despair. They feed off this. An attractive woman who fails to attract a man or elicit a mere complimentary look tells herself, &quot;he must be gay&quot; for her ego cannot stomach such an affront on her self-esteem. Women need constant validation, constant, constant, constant validation. Constantly checking the mirror, constantly fixing their makeup, constantly tucking and tossing their hair, constantly wearing loud clicking shoes to draw the male eye, constantly trying to hold onto that edge until it&#039;s obvious, with their waning youth, that they&#039;ve lost their hold, their pull on the male. A woman&#039;s self-worth and esteem is predicated on the number and quality of male suitors in her &#039;harem.&#039; That sexual relevance in a pool of non-verbal sexual interaction is something they feed on and look to men for. Their beauty is their currency, they use that get what they want. If their currency is not legal tender for most males, their self-esteem is lowered, they aim lower or not at all. Men validate their legal tender. Imagine two hot girls go into a club and not one guy looks at them or asks them  to dance. Men walk away from them, ignore them if they pull the lesbian act. Despite being supremely exquisite looking, they&#039;d wilt. Steve, your thoughts spring mainly from a unilateral male viewpoint, predominantly yours obviously, and your views are not universally acknowledged as maxims or axioms for men, thus you should speak for yourself and not presume to speak for men. I&#039;d have to hazard a guess that you are yet to have a female confidante who you&#039;d occasion to behold with her guard down, at least not one where mutual lack of attraction existed which would automatically negate the need for this legendary feminine ledgermain you seem befuddled and bedazzled by. That women don&#039;t need men the way men need women is obvious, they need and use men in different ways because they&#039;re different. Why you&#039;d devote a blog entry to it isn&#039;t. Women need men to the same degree, just in different ways. So, women not needing men? It&#039;s no aphorism yet, my old chap, it never has been, and it never will be. We exist and compliment each other. No we don&#039;t understand each other fully, we&#039;re not meant to. Mysterious, one&#039;s weakness is the other&#039;s strength. So says a fellow Bruin. On another note, I marvel that you studied Physics yet elect to dabble with a camera. I wish I had that brain power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The notion that a man requires a woman for completion and validation and not vice versa is quite risible. Were it so, creation would cease, women would wilt. Whether you see it or not, whether a woman chooses to acknowledge it or not, in public or private they are insecure beings who seek constant affirmation of their sex appeal and beauty from men, their staple diet being attention from desirable males, even when they&#8217;re married. Married women still like to think they can attract the roving eye only to dangle that sorry-I&#8217;m married-ring and delight in a poor bugger&#8217;s look of despair. They feed off this. An attractive woman who fails to attract a man or elicit a mere complimentary look tells herself, &#8220;he must be gay&#8221; for her ego cannot stomach such an affront on her self-esteem. Women need constant validation, constant, constant, constant validation. Constantly checking the mirror, constantly fixing their makeup, constantly tucking and tossing their hair, constantly wearing loud clicking shoes to draw the male eye, constantly trying to hold onto that edge until it&#8217;s obvious, with their waning youth, that they&#8217;ve lost their hold, their pull on the male. A woman&#8217;s self-worth and esteem is predicated on the number and quality of male suitors in her &#8216;harem.&#8217; That sexual relevance in a pool of non-verbal sexual interaction is something they feed on and look to men for. Their beauty is their currency, they use that get what they want. If their currency is not legal tender for most males, their self-esteem is lowered, they aim lower or not at all. Men validate their legal tender. Imagine two hot girls go into a club and not one guy looks at them or asks them  to dance. Men walk away from them, ignore them if they pull the lesbian act. Despite being supremely exquisite looking, they&#8217;d wilt. Steve, your thoughts spring mainly from a unilateral male viewpoint, predominantly yours obviously, and your views are not universally acknowledged as maxims or axioms for men, thus you should speak for yourself and not presume to speak for men. I&#8217;d have to hazard a guess that you are yet to have a female confidante who you&#8217;d occasion to behold with her guard down, at least not one where mutual lack of attraction existed which would automatically negate the need for this legendary feminine ledgermain you seem befuddled and bedazzled by. That women don&#8217;t need men the way men need women is obvious, they need and use men in different ways because they&#8217;re different. Why you&#8217;d devote a blog entry to it isn&#8217;t. Women need men to the same degree, just in different ways. So, women not needing men? It&#8217;s no aphorism yet, my old chap, it never has been, and it never will be. We exist and compliment each other. No we don&#8217;t understand each other fully, we&#8217;re not meant to. Mysterious, one&#8217;s weakness is the other&#8217;s strength. So says a fellow Bruin. On another note, I marvel that you studied Physics yet elect to dabble with a camera. I wish I had that brain power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Joseph Campbell’s Ten Commandments for reading Mythology by limewire</title>
		<link>http://www.kafilmworks.com/joseph-campbells-ten-commandments-for-reading-mythology/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>limewire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 11:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kafilmworks.com/?p=316#comment-24</guid>
		<description>fantastic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fantastic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

